🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the tension triggered by the announcement of a new 28-point plan for resolving the conflict appeared – temporarily – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "significant advancement" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its response: a renewed assault of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Diplomacy and Destruction

The sequence of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, negotiation efforts are waged: hopeful statements are delivered from various governments. Significant resources is allocated on containing particular approaches. By night, Russian leadership forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, military action persists as the main instrument for achieving "peace".

Nocturnal Warfare

As military strikes developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor projectile deployments from across the border, a capacity afforded by current data. From vantage locations, defense planes that had been scrambled to counter approaching aerial threats streaked across the sky – advanced fighter aircraft supplied to Ukraine by NATO members.

Shortly after, Kyiv's missile defense engaged: defensive missiles targeted at a Russian ballistic missile. This was a modern interception technology at work, probably supplied through partner states. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, rattling buildings. The moment of terror quickly gives way to grim resignation: perhaps the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, sparing the city from catastrophe and another blackout.

Continuous Dangers

Not long after, a heavy machine gun fired at a aerial vehicle in the vicinity, part of a rapid response unit – most likely Western-made equipment. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the enemy aircraft – it continued its flight toward its destination.

Intermittently, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the daybreak reports: several casualties, damage and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still continued their routines – experiencing conflict. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on external assistance – a need that European nations are evidently unprepared to replace in the near term.

Failed Diplomacy

The comprehensive proposal from Washington provoked deep reactions, controversy and serious worry – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after prior negotiation attempts and multilateral gatherings.

Every new approach from US leadership unfolds according to the consistent cycle: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, manages to fend off. They stabilise the situation but never actually secure success. This pattern will, undoubtedly, endure.

Strategic Calculations

It is easy to blame certain parties of consistently pushing Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. American leadership operates on a assumption understood by experienced diplomats: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The American government believes that it is unrealistic to compel Moscow to abandon the territory that it currently occupies in Ukraine's south or east.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does little to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the situation will not change more in its favour in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Russian leadership is certain that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their reason to sign a deal that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is close to zero. There may be many attempts to achieve ceasefire, but they will carry on as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still hold out, slowly losing people and territory but avoiding a total frontline collapse until conditions improve in its advantage.

Present Conditions

Factually, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, individual motivations are coming into play: personal goals to broker a ceasefire and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the country's interests against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their focus does not move to internal issues. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after current events, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These conflicting dynamics are guiding negotiations.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a just a single week to kill the proposed articles of the latest plan. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with pacifying measures of negotiators, and finally, recent disclosures, all did their job.

While new proposals based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist political attacks from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect specific hesitation to alter the situation, if they maintain solidarity and strengthen their defence capabilities at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the coming months, mainly require sustained allied backing.